[apple] 牛排入手

易卡螺丝君 2012-03-29
拜托 我给你看的是 LTE Advanced

GSM-->GPRS-->EDGE-->WCDMA-->HSDPA/HSUPA-->HSDPA+/HSUPA+-->FDD-LTE

易卡螺丝君 2012-03-29
何况现在intel的WinMax基本已经停滞了 事实标准就是LTE

在学术场合引用国内百科的资料 算是蛮少见的 虽然在正式场合 wikipedia也不能被认为是严肃的引用
易卡螺丝君 2012-03-29
还有你认为的是4G标准是什么? 给个例子让大家瞅瞅?
卡夫卡 2012-03-29
易卡螺丝君 写道
还有你认为的是4G标准是什么? 给个例子让大家瞅瞅?


你认为5G的标准是什么?举个例子给大家看看?

还没出来的标准,我怎么知道?我只知道,LTE是商家为了利益把3G增强包装出来的4G概念,实际上是3.9G,就和2G增强版EDGE(2.75G)一样。

高通:LTE不是4G技术 现在讲4G太超前
http://news.ccw.com.cn/commu/htm2009/20090414_615934.shtml
易卡螺丝君 2012-03-29
中文引用从来不能被作为正式严肃讨论的参考 这基本上是行业的规范 而且你还引用的是某厂商的申明 如同让三鹿申明自己没有放三聚氰胺一样是很荒谬和可笑的

记住我们讨论的不是主观感受的具体产品 例如安德猴和iOS ,而是在说客观定义的规范

引用
In March 2008, the International Telecommunications Union-Radio communications sector (ITU-R) specified a set of requirements for 4G standards, named the IMT-Advanced (International Mobile Telecommunications Advanced) specification, setting peak speed requirements for 4G service at 100 megabits per second (Mbit/s) for high mobility communication (such as from trains and cars) and 1 gigabit per second (Gbit/s) for low mobility communication (such as pedestrians and stationary users).[1]

Since the above mentioned first-release versions of Mobile WiMAX and LTE support much less than 1 Gbit/s peak bit rate, they are not fully IMT-Advanced compliant, but are often branded 4G by service providers. On December 6, 2010, ITU-R recognized that these two technologies, as well as other beyond-3G technologies that do not fulfill the IMT-Advanced requirements, could nevertheless be considered "4G", provided they represent forerunners to IMT-Advanced compliant versions and "a substantial level of improvement in performance and capabilities with respect to the initial third generation systems now deployed".[2]

Mobile WiMAX Release 2 (also known as WirelessMAN-Advanced or IEEE 802.16m') and LTE Advanced (LTE-A) are IMT-Advanced compliant backwards compatible versions of the above two systems, standardized during the spring 2011,[citation needed] and promising peak bit rates in the order of 1 Gbit/s. Services are expected in 2013.[3]



4G规范早在2008年就已经制定完成 没有规范怎么会出现那么多技术选型 对于LTE 委员会认可他被称成为4G 并非什么运营商包装的产品

并非我咬文嚼字 码农如果没有严谨的态度 很难生存下来
易卡螺丝君 2012-03-29
以上引用出处

^ ITU global standard for international mobile telecommunications ´IMT-Advanced´
http://wirelessman.org/liaison/docs/L80216-08_008.pdf

^ a b "ITU World Radiocommunication Seminar highlights future communication technologies"
http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2010/48.aspx
卡夫卡 2012-03-29
易卡螺丝君 写道
中文引用从来不能被作为正式严肃讨论的参考 这基本上是行业的规范 而且你还引用的是某厂商的申明 如同让三鹿申明自己没有放三聚氰胺一样是很荒谬和可笑的

记住我们讨论的不是主观感受的具体产品 例如安德猴和iOS ,而是在说客观定义的规范

引用
In March 2008, the International Telecommunications Union-Radio communications sector (ITU-R) specified a set of requirements for 4G standards, named the IMT-Advanced (International Mobile Telecommunications Advanced) specification, setting peak speed requirements for 4G service at 100 megabits per second (Mbit/s) for high mobility communication (such as from trains and cars) and 1 gigabit per second (Gbit/s) for low mobility communication (such as pedestrians and stationary users).[1]

Since the above mentioned first-release versions of Mobile WiMAX and LTE support much less than 1 Gbit/s peak bit rate, they are not fully IMT-Advanced compliant, but are often branded 4G by service providers. On December 6, 2010, ITU-R recognized that these two technologies, as well as other beyond-3G technologies that do not fulfill the IMT-Advanced requirements, could nevertheless be considered "4G", provided they represent forerunners to IMT-Advanced compliant versions and "a substantial level of improvement in performance and capabilities with respect to the initial third generation systems now deployed".[2]

Mobile WiMAX Release 2 (also known as WirelessMAN-Advanced or IEEE 802.16m') and LTE Advanced (LTE-A) are IMT-Advanced compliant backwards compatible versions of the above two systems, standardized during the spring 2011,[citation needed] and promising peak bit rates in the order of 1 Gbit/s. Services are expected in 2013.[3]



4G规范早在2008年就已经制定完成 没有规范怎么会出现那么多技术选型 对于LTE 委员会认可他被称成为4G 并非什么运营商包装的产品

并非我咬文嚼字 码农如果没有严谨的态度 很难生存下来


那我也来咬文嚼字一下,这里说了啊,LTE就是3G增强版(beyond-3G),不符合IMT-Advanced(也就是4G标准)的规范要求,但可以被认为是“4G”,注意是加了引号的“4G”,也就是我上面说的“准4G”。

实际情况中,建立真正的4G网络需要重建全新网络,成本太大,AT&T和Version等运营商为了平滑向真正4G过渡,推出3G加强版,就是LTE,宣称是4G,其实是“准4G”。
易卡螺丝君 2012-03-29
ls颠倒黑白能力佩服的五体投地 你怎么解释你之前说的运营商包装的说法

人家明明是委员会认可

还有4G标准早就盖棺定论了 ls之前为啥反问我5G是啥 这是啥逻辑?
卡夫卡 2012-03-29
引用
实际情况中,建立真正的4G网络需要重建全新网络,成本太大,AT&T和Version等运营商为了平滑向真正4G过渡,推出3G加强版,就是LTE,宣称是4G,其实是“准4G”。

这就是我解释运营商包装的说法啊!没有任何一个运营商有能力或者敢冒风险去建立标准4G网络,都是从3G增强版平滑过渡,但是为了造势宣传,宣称4G而已。

螺丝君英文很差吗?加引号的“4G”意思就是准4G,否则人家加引号干嘛,为什么不直接写could nevertheless be considered 4G???
易卡螺丝君 2012-03-29
这不是英文 是阁下语文水平突破天际了

你牛逼 加引号就是"准"

我输了 我输了!!!!!!!
Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics